Saturday, September 11, 2010

"Building What?" And why should we care...














"Building What?" And why should we care...

By Emily Vokes and The Friends and Supporters of 9/11 Truth Edmonton
September 11, 2010.

Photo : September 2, 2011, Farmer's Market - Tony Lambregts holds a copy of the 9/11 Investigator, a publication by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth. 


Building What? And, why should we care?
By Emily VokesQuestion: On 9/11, How Many Skyscrapers Collapsed? Answer: Three

Many have never heard about the third tower that collapsed on that horrific day, September 11, 2001.World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC7), a 47-story skyscraper was the third building that collapsed on September 11, 2001. This building, unlike World Trade Center 1 & 2, was not hit by a plane, yet it collapsed neatly into its own footprint at near free-fall speed at 5:20 PM on 9/11 (It was reported by the BBC as having already collapsed at 5:00, 20 minutes before it did). Neither before nor since have steel high-rises collapsed due to fire, which was the reason given for the fateful building collapses that day. Overwhelming evidence disproves the official story put out to the public by the 9/11 Commission. Indeed, the 571-page 9-11 Commission Report did not mention Building 7 at all. (The reply of a commissioner, when asked why the collapse of WTC7 was omitted, was that it was not considered significant enough to be included in the report.) Both FEMA and NIST’s later reports failed to explain how the fires in WTC7 caused total collapse at free-fall speed.

We need to, at the very least, take the responsibility to explore the truth of September 11, 2001. 9/11 was the pretext for 3 wars: The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the “War on Terrorism” (that according to Donald Rumsfeld, “will not end in our lifetimes”). Our government and our media have failed us. There has been no rational explanation from the White House, the media, the 9/11 Commission to justify the ensuing wars in retribution for 9/11. Likewise, there has been no proven rational explanation from our own Canadian government and media of why Canada is in Afghanistan. Canada readily joined the war in Afghanistan, even though there was no investigation to prove that the criminals that murdered 25 Canadians that day came from Afghanistan. If the reason is retribution as stated by Gordon O’Connor, where is the investigation to support this allegation?

Addressing the Princess Patricia troops in Edmonton, it was reported, ‘Canada is fighting the Taliban in Afghanistan in "retribution" for the 9/11 attacks that killed at least 3,000 people, including 25 Canadians, Defense Minister Gordon O'Connor said yesterday.’ The Ottawa Citizen January 21, 2007. At a symposium, attended by mainly military personnel, O’Connor also said, “When the Taliban or al Qaeda came out of Afghanistan, they attacked the twin towers and in those twin towers, 25 Canadians were killed. The previous government and this government will not allow Canadians to be killed without retribution". Defense Minister acknowledges 9/11 deaths of Canadians by Arthur Weinreb Wednesday, January 24, 2007, Canada Free Press. Where is the evidence to support O’Connor’s statement of retribution? It is imperative that Canada conduct a proper and impartial investigation into the crimes of 9/11 and the murders of the Canadians who perished September 11, 2001. Until then, Canada MUST bring the troops home.

It is past time for us to see another point of view. There is hard evidence that our media and government refuse to acknowledge, regarding the truth of 9/11. Why? Why the silence? We have investigations on pretty much everything else. 1600 dead ducks in the tar ponds. Dead stingrays at the Calgary Zoo. Fires, accidents, murders. Why no investigation on the Canadian deaths of September 11, 2001? There is a smoking gun out there and we need to know the truth. War and the consequences of war will continue to flourish, if we don’t do anything about it.

There are those who claim that while it might be possible to pull off an event on the scale of a 9/11, it would be impossible to cover it up for very long; someone would spill the beans sooner or later. With this claim in mind, we can look back to the Manhattan Project. The Project was carried out in extreme secrecy, with nearly 40 laboratories and factories employing upwards of 200,000 people (many who didn't know the project would be used to drop the bombs on Japan). The operations were kept secret until the announcement of the Hiroshima bombing and the ensuing nuclear explosion. Canada was involved too. As part of its contribution to the Manhattan Project, Canada built and operated Project '9,' a heavy water plant at Trail, British Columbia. Housed in Chalk River, Ontario was one of four secret laboratories that were part of the project. Canadian universities were involved with project research and Canadian scientists relocated to the United States to work on the Manhattan Project.

Hundreds of credible critics who question the official account of 9/11 from the military, intelligence services, law enforcement, government, professional architects and engineers, chemists, physicists, pilots, professors and others can be found at the Patriots Question 9/11 website. They have established beyond any reasonable doubt that the official account of 9/11 is false and that, therefore, the official “investigations” bear the appearance of cover-up operations.

Even John Farmer, Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission, stated in his 2009 book, The Ground Truth, “In the course of our investigation into the national response to the attacks, the 9/11 Commission staff discovered that the official version of what occurred that morning—that is, when government and military officials had told Congress, the Commission, the media, and the public about who knew what when—was almost entirely, and inexplicably, untrue…the events of the day as entered in the records were unmistakable and unmistakably different from what officials had claimed…”

1270 architectural and engineering professionals and 9163 other supporters including A&E students are demanding of Congress a truly independent investigation. Hard core evidence is presented at their website ae911truth.org, as well as at numerous others. Why are we not demanding the same of our Canadian government?

To date, late-August 2010, on the eve of the 9th anniversary of September 11, 2001, there has been no criminal prosecution done or justice served for the victims or the victim’s families. Yet we are still fighting in this war of “retribution.” Do Canadians not deserve, and are we not entitled to an honest, independent, subpoena- powered, oath-based investigation into the Canadian deaths on 9/11 and for our war of “retribution?” After all, this war is being waged with our tax dollars and in our names. At the very least, shouldn’t our elected representatives be calling for a re-investigation, or an international investigation into these war crimes? There is no statute of limitation for murder.

It is our duty as citizens to educate ourselves and question the decisions that our elected representatives have made in our name. We must ask: Who has benefited from these wars and the War on Terrorism? We demand an investigation to justify our participation in the war in Afghanistan, and to show why our troops, their families with their losses of husbands, brothers, fathers and sons, wives, sisters, mothers and daughters, the Afghani and Iraqi civilians, as well as our civil liberties and human rights are being sacrificed in the “War on Terrorism.”


Friends and Supporters of 9/11 Truth Signatories: Rebecca Bodo, Matthew Lambregts, Tony Lambregts, George Heagle, Cristina Mikhaiel, Bruce Sinclair, Jeff Markwart, Kyle Roy, Richard D. Brinkman and Emily Vokes


1 comment:

  1. Engineering is dedicated to Engineers which has all the latest information you need to make informed decisions about your future. Read our website for most valuable information.

    ReplyDelete